Between 450-455 at the southern coast of the North Sea, a betrayal took place that has not been forgotten ever since. And it never will. It is the bloody battle at the citadel of king Finn. Or, Fin Folcwalding Fresna cynne, as he was named in the Anglo-Saxon poem Widsith. A poem dating from the early tenth century. Finn, son of Folcwald, and young king of the Frisian tribe. A battle that shook the North Sea world. But why was, and is, it a battle to be remembered? And who is this Finn anyway?
This post takes the reader back to the dawning of Frisia. To a time after the Great Wandering of Peoples. When at the wet waterfront of the southern North Sea a new tribe identity was forged using building blocks from Old-Frisians, Saxons, Franks and southern Scandinavians. Frisia was located central because liminal (IJssennagger 2017). In fact, a long-standing historic concept which, very appropriate, we found in a noval about Finn too:
“To the north and west of us, across the Swan Road, lies the land of the Britons where the Angles and Saxons now rule. To the north and east,” he [Finn] continued, adjusting his grip on his staff and pointing just north of the rising sun, “lies the land of the Danes. And south of us,” he finished, turning around and looking out over Hwitstan, “is the Merovingian kingdom – the land of the Franks. And beyond the Frankish kingdoms lie all of the great kingdoms of the continent. Our land stands at the center of these like a young sapling in the midst of a great oak forest.”The Finnsburg Encounter (Dickerson 1991)
After the heroic story of the battle had been sung by minstrels and bards, and orally passed on for centuries, it was finally put into writing as well. Two early-medieval texts report about the famous battle in which “the edge of a sword sealed Finn’s doom”, namely the monumental Old English epic poem Beowulf and the so-called Finnsburh Fragment. The latter, the Fragment, is a leoð being a heroic poem that was sung. The Fragment also happens to be the oldest surviving pagan poem in Old English. The word leoð is similar to the current Mid-Frisian word liet for song, or Lied and lied in respectively German and Dutch languages.
Finnsburh is also written as Finnsburg, Finnesburg and Finnsburuh. Here we shall use Finnsburh. The name Finn is sometimes written as Fin. Here we will use Finn.
The whole affair is called freswæle too, meaning ‘Frisian slaughter’ in Old English. In the story of Beowulf, the fight at Finnsburh is one of the tales told when warriors gathered and celebrated their heroic deeds. Apparently, it was a legendary story worth reciting during feasts in halls of lords, kings, overkings and other big men. Who knows, in houses of common people on terps (i.e artificial settlement mounds) on the barren salt marshes of Frisia too, during the long, wet winters. A landscape where strong winds coming from sea have free play, and from which there is no hiding behind natural shelters. Of course, the Frisians might have had a different version of the course of events of the freswæle than that of their contemporary Anglo-Saxon and Danish cousins, and why their king bit the mud. You will understand why after you have red this post.
1. The name Finn
The name Finn is widely known. A Swedish legend has it ‘Finn the Giant’ built the cathedral of Lund in southern Sweden near Malmö. This Finn is said to be depicted on a pillar in the crypt of this cathedral dating early twelfth century. In Danish folklore, however, the figure Finn was not a giant but an ugly troll instead. A bit more to the northeast from Denmark, a whole country is filled up with witchy Fins. Indeed, everyone knows, Fins and witchcraft are one an the same. Back to Denmark. At the Danish island Fyn, also called Funen, near the village of Gudme, the most important so-called Central-Place-Complex (CPC) has been discovered known today. The area flourished between ca. 400-600. Indeed, the time of King Finn. Kilos of gold have been found, and big halls similar to those described in the epic Beowulf. One hall measured an amazing forty-seven by ten meters. These southern Scandinavian type CPC’s have been identified in what is now the Netherlands as well, especially around towns of Rijnsburg and Egmond in respectively provinces Zuid Holland and Noord Holland. Further below we will dig a bit deeper into these CPC’s.
Furthermore, the name Finn is a common Anglo-Saxon name. In this respect, since the character Finn Dandridge appeared in the highly popular tv-series Grey’s Anatomy around 2005 -and this Finn clearly was not an ugly Danish troll- the name Finn became a hit in the Netherlands. Thus the Netherlands is filling up with Finns too. Concerning Mark Twain’s book ‘Huckleberry Finn’ we will come back to you. It still needs some research, especially the history of the Frisians as well-known slave traders in the Early Middle Ages. In Ireland and Scotland the name Finn surfaces from the black peaty waters with Loch Finn and Glenfinnan. But, maybe also related to fen or fenland. And, a ffynnon is a well or spring in Welsh language. Finngaill or finngenti means fair foreigners in old Irish texts. Of course, we must nog forget to mention the Celtic hero Finn, also known as Fionn mac Cumhaill. The Irish hero who got his wisdom from his thumb. Lastly, a finne in modern Mid-Frisian language is a kind of meadow that is rarely or never mowed.
In sum, not much coherence at all with this very arbitrary overview, except the fact that the name Finn is found in the wider North Sea area. Maybe one of the best etymological explanations of the name Finn is the Old Germanic finnaz meaning ‘breathing, inspired, invested’, in other words the inspirator (Van Renswoude 2017). Whereas the Celtic Finn stems from fionn, meaning light.
Since this post is also about Tolkien, we need to say something about his books as well. In Tolkien’s book The Silmarillion, one of the three forefathers of the elves is king Finwë of the House of Finwë, king of Noldor. Probably Tolkien took the Old Germanic finnaz as inspiration, or maybe straight the name Finn from the Beowulf and the Fragment, since he made a full study into this Frisian king (see further below). King Finwë had many descendants bearing his name: Fingolfin, Fingon, Finarfin, Finrod, Finduilas and Curufin. The Silmarils are three briljant ornaments that were stolen. It was Fëanor, son of Finwë, who created the Silmarils. The central role beautiful crafted jewels or ornaments could play in pre-medieval mythology, is illustrated with the Brísingamen, mentioned in the Beowulf too and in other old sources too. Read also our post Ornament of the Gods found in a mound of clay to learn how and where the Brísingamen, king Hygelac’s neck-ring, has been retrieved in Frisia.
2. Finn the legend
The fact a Frisian king is mentioned in the monumental epic Beowulf, his name is confirmed in several other early-medieval texts, the events at the citadel Finnsburh have taken place in Frisia, and this king was of inspiration for Tolkien’s famous books, is unique in itself. Sadly, this piece of history receives little to no attention in history lessons at high schools in the Netherlands. Not even in province Friesland. We do not how it is in states of Lower Saxony or Schleswig-Holstein, so please do fill us in. Let us conclude for now that the metre and the non-straightforwardness of the Old English verses of the Beowulf are not only for pupils difficult to read and understand. Maybe this post can help out teachers a bit. In their defense, it took the Brits also very long to appreciate the epic Beowulf. Actually, not before the Second World War had ended.
So, let’s tell more about king Finn, for the history of the world is but the biography of the great, is it not?
The text of the Beowulf dates from around the year 850. That is already pretty vintage. But personages appearing in the Beowulf are even much older, and go back to the period of the Wandering of the Peoples, also known as the Migration Period. The main character warrior Beowulf is a nephew of king Hygelac who is king of the Geats. A people living in the southeast of present-day Sweden. Hygelac is indisputable historic and recorded by historians in the sixth century already. According to historian Gregory of Tours, Hygelac was killed during a raid at the (old) mouth of the River Rhine. It must have been in the year 516. This might have been at or near the settlement of Rothulfuashem or Hrothaluashem, meaning Rothulf’s or Radulfus’ home in the eight century. It was renamed Rinasburg ‘Rhine-burh’ in the ninth century after a ring fortress had been build. Probably a defense against Viking raids. Today, the town of Rinasburg is known as Rijnsburg. According to other sources, Hygelac was killed by the Franks between 516 and 534, a bit more upstream the River Rhine, near the present-day city of Nijmegen in province Gelderland. Read our post Ornament of the Gods found in a mound of clay to learn more about king Hygelac’s wild adventures in Frisia.
Thus, Beowulf’s nephew might have been killed by the Frisians although the Salian Franks can be held responsible too. We leave it to the prosecutor’s office who was guilty. Not long after these events, in this river-land at the River Old Rhine, the Frisians would establish an unprecedented big trade emporium named Dorestat. This town was located at the present-day town of Wijk bij Duurstede in province Utrecht. To attain this jewel of the Rhine, the Frisians and the Franks would engage in a long and bloody competition during most of the seventh and eighth centuries. And, topping it off with many heavy Viking raids in the ninth century, plundering Dorestat year after year. The emporium Witla, located somewhere in the mouth of the River Meuse near present Voorne, for example, would never recover from the Viking attack in the year 836. For more backgrounds on Dorestat and a bit more nuanced view on the Viking raids on Dorestat, read our post The Batwing Doors of Northwest Europe.
The exact spot where the stronghold Finnsburh was situated, will probably stay unknown forever. There is a local bar in the outskirts of The Hague called Finnenburg, but that is hardly convincing. We can, however, safely assume it must have been within the terrotory of West Frisia. In the late fifth century, Frisia stretched from the northern coast of the Netherlands to the northwest coast of Germany, up to the River Weser. Furthermore, the estuaries of the rivers Rhine and Meuse and the basins of the River Rhine and the River Stichtse Vecht, belonged to the area considered Frisia too already in the fifth century. The raid of king Hygelac was in West Frisia where the River Rhine flowed. In the sixth century, Frisians also settled in current province Zeeland and the coastal zone of West Flanders too, with the southern-most border Sincfala. Check our post A Frontier known as a watery Mess: the Coast of Flanders about this southern border of Frisia.
We think the central river lands, and the River (Old-) Rhine in particular, might contest for the seat of Frisian (over)kings. This area gave them control over important trade networks, and at the same being connected to the elite network of the wider North Sea that had developed from the sixth century onward. As said, battles at the mouth or upstream the River Rhine have been recorded during this era (Hygelac) and archaeological finds (e.g. coinage of ca. 600 of Audulf a ‘king’ of Frisia upstream the River Rhine) are indications. Lastly, very practical, the area supplied local rulers with plenty of remnants of former Roman fortresses of scarce stone that were part of the Roman limes ‘border’ a few centuries earlier. Who knows, future archaeological research in the area of Rothulfuashem might disclose more about rulers immediately after the Migration Period.
The River Stichtse Vecht basin in province Noord Holland has also strong claims for being seat of kings or big men. The River Stichtse Vecht being a crucial and lucrative logistical connection between the Frankish hinterland to the south and southern Scandinavia to the north. From different early-medieval sources we know part of this pagus ‘district’ called Niftarlake was ‘property’ of Frisian elites, chiefly the family Wurssing at the end of the seventh century. The Wursing family had their family estate at the present village Nederhorst ten Berg, back then called Werinon. The person Wurssing was also the grandparent of Saint Ludger who would later convert his own Frisian kin. Many place names, particular in the northern area of the River Stichtse Vecht basin, are of Frisian origin or have a Frisian predecessor.
It was at the settlement of Attingahem ‘home of Atto’, a Frisian first name and still being used as Atte in province Friesland, where Saint Boniface founded his first church around the year 720. Today, the name Attingahem is replaced by the non-Frisian place name Breukelen. Read also our post Attingahem Bridge to learn more of pagus Niftarlake and its connection with among other Brooklyn, New York. Also, the so-called asega law tradition was applicable in pagus Niftarlake, which is a typical Frisian practice. From 719, this area came under Frankish rule, after which much of pagus Niftarlake fell under the jurisdiction of monastery of Werden. Later, in the course of the tenth century, much of it came under controle of the counts of Hamaland and was renamed Naerdinclant.
The importance of the River Stichtse Vecht basin might date back at the times of heathenism. In this area between three to six so-called table mountains have been identified, namely Tafelberg near the town of Blaricum, and Eukenberg and Sijdjesberg near the town of Huizen. Three possible other table mountains were Leeuwenberg near the village of Oud Valkeveen, Trapjesberg near the town of Huizen and Zwarte Berg near the town of Hilversum. Quite a high density, and that is an understatement. These are, or were since several have been dug up, all conical shaped artificial mounds with a flattened top. Often surrounded at its base by an earthwork. Unsure what their purpose was; religious, military or political. Although very old, dating the table mountains is quite impossible but assumed to be prehistoric. From written sources we know these table mounds existed at least at the tenth century. A similar mound is known in southern England, namely Silbury Hill (Schuyf 2019).
Rothulfuashem & Central-Place-Complexes
To dig a bit deeper on Rothulfuashem at the mouth of the River Rhine. This settlement was part of a CPC akin to those existed in southern Scandinavia (Dijkstra 2011), icluding island Fyn in Denmark. Underlining the influence of Scandinavian culture in Frisia as well as kinship between the two. But this aside.
A CPC was an area with a diameter varying between five and twenty-five kilometers, mostly strategically located at a river mouth. Within this area different functions were located, all belonging to one social-political entity. These different functions were: the residence of the elite or Gefolgschaft (i.e. a large building called a ‘hall’), the place for craft (e.g. a blacksmith and/or a mint for coinage), the location for trade or vicus mostly along the river banks, the place of heathen cult, the place of burial, the fortifications or military stronghold, and the location of the thing. A thing (also ting, ding or þing) being a place on a hillock for assembly and judgement. Check out our post The Thing is… to find more information anout these Germanic assemblies and the specific part Frisians played in this piece of history.
Many of these functions within a similar area can be identified along the Netherlands’ coast too. Firstly, in the area Katwijk-Rijnsburg-Valkenburg-Oegstgeest, with De Luttele Geest being the location of the former thing. A second area is Hargen-Egmond-Egmond aan Zee-Egmond Binnen (formerly called Hallem)-Heiloo-Velsen in province Noord Holland. This might be a former CPC-location too, with De Schepelenberg near the town of Heemskerk as the location of the thing. The former place name Hallem of present-day Egmond-Binnen, indicates the presence of a hall. A citadel of an elite. The place name Hargen is related to Old Germanic hearg like Harrow north of London in England is as well, and means ‘heathen shrine’. Another, third, CPC is suspected at the mouth of the River Meuse. Because much land disappeared into the sea here, this will stay speculation for ever probably.
Lastly, research suggest that the northern part of pagus ‘district’ Westergo (originally named Uuistrachia ‘western island’) in province Friesland, can be considered a CPC too (Nicolay 2005). That would be the fourth one. This because of the amount of gold (a sloppy 1.5 kilo in total) which has been found in its fat clay, the clear connections with the elites of Jutland and later Kent, the political-religious expressions through the jewelry and runes found, production of high-end goods, and, finally, the geographical central (trade) position the area has between southern Scandinavian and the east Anglo-Saxon world at the British Isles.
Increasing evidence is piled up in neighboring pagus ‘district’ Oostergo, originally called Austrachia ‘eastern island’, that here too a power base existed. The remains of a sixth-century vendel helmet (see further below) and the sixth-century silver rings of a sword pommel, are indication. The remains of the vendel helmet were found at the village of Hallum, not to be confused with Hallem in province Noord Holland, mentioned earlier. The remains of the ring-sword, i.e. silver rings molded to the pommel of the sword, were found near the town of Dokkum. The molded rings, also found in Kent, might have been gifts demonstrating a warrior’s fealty to his lord (Brooks & Harrington 2010). And, again the place name Hallum here too indicates the former presence of a hall of a big man. Or, belonged the areas Uuistrachia and Austrachia to the same CPC, to the same big man or king?
Back to the CPC at the mouth of the River Old Rhine. More can be speculated about the person Radulf after whom the settlement Rothulfuashem was named. Was he just a so-called big man or even a king? He must have lived in the eighth century, and we know he had possessions in Hoverathorp (near the present-day town of Katwijk) too, together with a person named Erulf or Herulf (family?) who in turn had possessions more upstream the rivers near the present-day town of Houten in province Utrecht. Radulf, together with his wife(?) Aldburga, also gave donations to the bishopric Utrecht. Later, in the ninth century, possessions around Rothulfuashem were in hands of the nobles Gerulfings, the future counts of West Frisia after Viking rule in Frisia had ended. In the year 1101, this dynasty of the Gerulfings would rename themselves counts of Holland. Are therefore the Gerulfings descendants of big man Radulf? In the first half of the twelfth century an abbey was founded at Rijnsburg, underling the historical importance of this area concerning the ruling elite.
Read also our post The Abbey of Egmond and the Rise if the Gerulfing Dynasty to learn more about the birth of Holland out of West Frisia.
Taking into account the fact the events of the Beowulf can be traced back to the beginning of the sixth century, the fact the grandson of Odin, the famous Hengest, himself was present at the scene, and the fact this lone warrior together with Horsa must have staged their invasion of Britain between 449 and 455, king Finn therefore is commonly placed around the year 450. Only a few decennia before, at the end of the Migration Period, the abandoned, empty tidal marshlands of the southern coast of the North Sea were re-populated with peoples from more to the east (Germany) and the north (southern Scandinavia), admixing with the very few existing original Frisians (i.e. Frisii) still left. The new peoples later called themselves Frisians too.
Maybe the father of king Finn, Folcwald, was one of the early immigrants re-populating the nearly empty wetlands of ancient Frisia. Read our post It all began with piracy to find an explanation as to way the name Frisia stuck in history.
wandering of the peoples
Research is pretty conclusive about the fact the salt marshes of northern Netherlands, especially those in present-day province Friesland, were nearly abandoned during the period ca. 325-425. Neither the collapse of the Roman Empire nor the arrival of the Huns in Europe caused the coastal people of the tidal marshlands to move. Climate change, however, did. It was the deterioration of the environment that had a major impact on living conditions. The sea level rose in the fourth century, making drainage of sweet water from the hinterland difficult and causing the interior to turn into malaria-infected swamps, no longer suitable for living and for agriculture. People emigrated from there. The disappearance of inland habitation affected habitation at the Wadden Sea shores as well, since village-networks were essential to survive. Among other, the Frisians migrated south from the middle of the third century, and settled in lower River Rhine area, but also moved up the River Scheldt in Flanders (Dhaeze 2019).
Having said that, some terps (i.e. manmade dwelling mounds) in present-day province Friesland show continuation of modest population throughout the Migration Period, like the terp-villages Driesumer-terp, Hatsum, Hoogebeintum, Jelsum, Marssum and Wijnaldum-Tjitsma. And, although habitation on terps like Dongjum and Peins discontinued, these higher and fertile terps were still being used as arable land during this era, indicating modest habitation in the area still.
Habitation in the terp region of the Ommelanden in the northeast of the Netherlands, decreased strongly like the archaeological excavation of the terp Ezinge demonstrated. The same is the case for the terp region of northwestern Germany. Both regions were probably lesser affected than the area of province Friesland during the fourth century. Archaeological research has shown habitation that continued at the terp (called Wurt in Ostfriesland) of Fedderson in Germany, for example.
The environment of Frisia along the North Sea coast, what is more or less the present-day region Kennemerland and the (former) islands Texel and Wieringen, deteriorated too in the fourth century. This might be due to land-loss because of a North Sea moving east, combined with a period of drought and thus stronger dune formation, making the coastal zone useless for agriculture. This was also the case for the area further to the south between the mouth of the River Old Rhine and the mouth of the River Meuse. A significant decrease of population occurred here as well in the fourth century, and is therefore comparable to the salt-marsh area in the north. But habitation continued modestly along the North Sea coast, for example as it did at Oosterbuurt near the town of Castricum, at Dorregeest near the town of Uitgeest, and close to the town of Schagen.
Most research adopts a two-migration-wave theory during the end of the Migration Period. The first wave was that of the Angles and the Saxons at the turn of the fourth and fifth centuries. Especially the rivers Elbe-Weser triangle was an important cradle of the new settlers, the new Frisians. Probably they admixed with the few original Frisians (i.e. Frisii) left. The second wave followed closely, around the second half of the fifth century, and was composed of Jutes and southern Norwegians. Probably they admixed with the previous mixture. These immigrant waves filled the near empty lands with, as said, some small pockets of original, pre-Roman Frisians still being there. The originals (Frisii) being a people of maybe mixed Celtic and Germanic composition. Read our post The Celtic-Frisian heritage: There’s no dealing with the Wheel of Fortune.
Other theories suggest Old-Frisian tribes re-entered the tidal marshlands from what is now the northern part of province Noord Holland. From the Frisian pockets, as described above, where habitation had continued during the Migration Period. This secondary migration movement does not exclude the two-migration-wave theory. It can have been a mixture of both. Old tribes from what would soon become West Frisia (Noord Holland) and Saxon and, to a lesser extent, Scandinavian tribes re-populating the vast salt marshes of the north.
So, making the Frisians a cocktail of old Celtic-Frisians (Frisii), Saxons, Angles, Jutes and Scandinavians re-populating the coastal zone from West Flanders in Belgium in the south all the way to the Weser in Germany in the north, including the lower central river lands in the Netherlands, in the fifth century. Read our post Have a Frisians cocktail to find out more about the origin of the Frisians.
When looking at the golden and silver artifacts the new Frisians produced, they combined style elements of the different cultures around them. Resulting in, for example, the beautiful fibulae in the second quarter of the seventh century. A specific style element in fibulae was the so-called ‘kidney shape’. This suggests by then a solid, new identity was established, and the new Frisians were detached from the dominant Scandinavian elite of Jutes and southern Norwegians. It is also the century Frisia politically expanded all the way to Sincfala, the present border with Belgium. And the period that Frisia started wrestling with its, at the end too powerful, Frankish opponent in the south. This was a period of social and political change, resulting too in increased soil depositions and grave gifts, especially of swords and other weaponry. It was an expression of the emphasize that was placed within the communities on warrior culture and communication with the world of the gods.
The Inconvenient Truth – It should be noted that the dispute and often-named ‘the inconvenient truth’ about the hiatus and origine of the Frisians during the fourth century concerns mainly archaeologists and historians within the province Friesland in the Netherlands. Surprise surprise, we hear you think. Yes, the study of history is first of all politics.
Archaeological research in the terp regions of northwestern Germany is, as yet, lesser developed and could in time of course give us new important insight on these aspects too. Let us hope for that. Thank the Valletta Treaty of 1992.
Whatever the exact story, try to picture the new tribes entering the nearly deserted, wet and treeless salt-marsh area in the fifth century. With everywhere scattered old, abandoned house platforms, terps and low tidal dikes. Sometimes the remains of old houses still visible and abandoned terps being used as fields for producing crops by small Frisian communities. The newcomers bringing in their livestock and re-occupying, repairing and enlarging the former house platforms and terps. How went the encounters with the few original Frisians still present, we wonder? It must have been a fascinating sight.
Even if king Finn never existed, although the odds are otherwise, he and his story was (and is) legendary in the North Sea culture all the same. It became part of the new ancestral tales of the shaken-and-stirred peoples of the North Sea, following the turbulent Migration Period. Know, however, that this picture of massive shifts of peoples during the Migration Period has been nuanced by scholars. Nevertheless, the slaughter of king Finn was an event even before the Middle Ages had started. And it was well-known. Obviously, because the tale concerned both a king of a strong maritime confederacy of sea people, the Frisians, and the legendary future invader of Britain, Hengest (and Horsa).
a sea tribe
The Frisians were a people that had emerged during the Migration Period as the most prominent tribe dominating the North Sea with their ships, sails, nautical skills, cultural background and goods. Trading and maintaining relationships, including between the British isles, southern Scandinavia and the Continent. A sea that was named mare Fresicum all the way through the Early Middle Ages.
At ipsi, cum navigarent circa Pictos, vastaverunt Orcades insulas, et venerunt et occupaverunt regiones plurimas ultra Mare Frenessicum usque ad confinium Pictorum.But when they sailed around the Picts, they wasted the Orkney islands, and they went and occupied many regions past the Frisian Sea till the border of the Picts (Historia Britonum of Nennius, ninth century, quoting Gildas, sixth century).
Mare Fresicum, id est quod inter nos Scottosque est.The Frisian Sea, that lies between us and the Scots (Historia Britonum of Nennius, ninth century).
And this water-people would expand and hold this position at sea for the next centuries, despite the upcoming power of their other cousins, their neighbors the Vikings together with the Franks. The Frisian trade networks survived. The importance of the Frisian free-traders finally faded in the High Middle Ages. Although, the Frisians sea traders kept a strong position as maritime freighters with the Baltic Sea all the way till the end of the eighteenth century.
It were not only the Frisians who emerged in this region at the end of the Migration Period. Also the Salian Franks, mentioned already, entered history. More inland south of Frisia, region Hamaland in current province Gelderland was the cradle of the Merovingian empire. From here the Franks expanded south to present-day Belgium laying there the foundation of Francia and France. Do not tell the French.
Now, how unique is all the above already? And you still have to read the story of the historic battle below, which we tried to postpone as long as possible in this post. Try to visualize all of the above and how it must have looked like when reading about the battle at Finnsburh. Tolkien did anyway. He (re)created in his books an ancient, mythical world and he specifically studied the dramatic story of king Finn. Tolkien’s study ‘Finn and Hengest’ was posthumously published.
3. The Freswæle at Finnsburh
Where was the fuzz all about in the hall of young king Finn 1,500 years ago? Was it an ordinary power struggle? Was it just (usual) treacherous family-in-law? Was it a tragic love story? Or, was it the famous Hengest, founder of the Kentish royal dynasty Oiscingas, who had bigger plans?
Unfortunately it is difficult to reconstruct exactly what happened. Especially, since the bard or minstrel who tells or sings the story of Finnsburh to Beowulf and the other gathered warriors, assumes his mead-drinking audience had a general knowledge of the famous story already, and therefor skips a lot of context. Modern bureaucrats woulds say: “Give me only a few bullets.” The same holds true for the Fragment. This compression by the poet of the Beowulf makes understanding the tale difficult. Read also our post about these Frisian bards. Nevertheless, here is a valid historical version of the course of events:
King Finn, son of Folcwaldan, and young king of Frisia, is married to Hildeburh. Queen Hildeburh is a daughter of king and Haelfdane Hoc, descendant of the heraldic Scyldingas and ruler of the Hocingas. It is unclear who the Hocingas exactly were but they were a Danish people.
When the young prince and Haelfdane Hnaef, brother of Hildeburh and thus brother-in-law of king Finn, stayed at the stronghold of king Finn in Frisia for the celebration of Yule, a first fight broke out between the Danes and the Frisians.
Reasons for this initial fight are not given. But daring politics of king Finn may have played a role. Finn established an alliance with the Danes through the marriage with Hildeburh. At the same time it was king Finn who accepted the Jutes in his land and in his service. The Jutes had lost their last king and were on drift in the region. The fact Hengest accompanied the Danes provoked the Jutish party of Finn. Hengest was not a nobody. He would later, together with his brother Horsa, lead the invasion of Britain. But more importantly in this Shakespearean drama, Hengest was of royal stock and even descendant of king Wihtlæg of the Angles. And, it was king Wihtlæg who exterminated the dynasty of the Jutes only a couple generations before. So, the Jutes might still have had some resentment towards Hengest.
The battle lasted five days in which prince Hnaef, the son of Finn and sixty other warriors were besieged in the hall by Jutish warriors in service of king Finn. It might very well be that king Finn gave the hall to prince Hnaef and his men in order to be able to defend themselves against the Jutes. At the end of the battle prince Hnaef was killed. King Finn suffered the loss of many men and even of his son. A son born out of the marriage with Hildeburh and who probably was raised by Hnaef with the Danes. No name of the son is given, alas.
Famous adventurer Hengest took over command from prince Hnaef. King Finn and Hengest himself agreed on a peace treaty, whereby Finn had to give treasure to the Danes to compensate for the death of prince Hnaef and to keep the peace. Prince Hnaef and the son of Finn were cremated side by side on a pyre in Frisia (see note below) and the Danes returned to their lands. Hengest, perhaps exiled already before the battle by his own people the Angles, stayed the winter with queen Hildeburh at the hall of Finn.
After the winter the Danes returned. They demanded loyalty from Hengest and therefore that he would avenge yet prince Hnaef despite the treaty made with king Finn. Hengest choose side with the Danes. In this second fight king Finn was slaughtered. After the fight, Hengest and the Scyldinga warriors took queen Hildeburh back to the raiders’ home; home of the Danes.
The above is based on the texts the Beowulf, the Fragment and on the research of especially Tolkien and of Bliss. We avoided naming too many names of warriors etc, because it would become very confusing.
According to Tolkien, king Finn and prince Hnaef were caught up by the circumstances of an internal Jutish feud. Tolkien thought both the Danes and the Frisians had contracted Jutes into their armies, and these Jutish parties were having a feud among each other. Tolkien suggests Hengest played a double role by breaking the treaty and not upholding his oath. This in contrast to king Finn. So, Tolkien backed Finn.
But maybe we should give Hengest some more credit. When it comes to Hengest’s role, we find the arguments of Bliss more convincing, namely that Hengest was not a Jute but an Angle. Not your regular Angle either. He was a descendant of the Angle dynasty. Tolkien, namely, assumed Hengest was a Jute, since Old English historical sources say it were the Jutes who invaded Kent. If Hengest was an Angle, he too might have been caught up by the circumstances, and his loyalty was literally demanded with significant pressure by the Danes to avenge the death of prince Hnaef. Hengest’s situation after the battle became or stayed precarious. Not wanted anymore by the Frisians, the Jutes and probably earlier already not by his own people, the Angles, too.
Only a decade earlier before Finn’s death, around the year 410 when the Romans pulled out of Britannia, Briton chiefs had recruited (also) Jutes, Angles and Saxon mercenaries to defend themselves. After that, word was spread at the Continent by these mercenaries that the land overseas was fertile and the Britons were cowards. Just a few years after the battle of Finnsburh, Hengest and his brother Horsa staged their attack at Britain. Coincidence?
Became curious and want to read it yourself? Please find further below the two original texts of the Finnsburh Fragment and of the Beowulf’s Finnsburh episode together with a English translation.
We can also very much recommend you to read the (translated) Beowulf, if you want to have a vivid picture of how the strongly related culture of the Frisians must have been in the pre- and Early Middle Ages. Not without reason Tolkien, creator of the Lord of the Rings, had a special interest in the Battle of Finnsburh, as described in the epic Beowulf and the Fragment. For example, reading Beowulf you will learn that pre and early-medieval society was a gift economy. Rings, actually bracelets, of silver or gold were broken and the pieces were given as part of building or reinforcing alliances. Moreover, swords of important warriors or kings had two rings attached to the pommel, the so-called rings-swords mentioned earlier in this post. Kings, overkings and other chiefs were therefore often alternatively described as ‘ring giver’ or ‘ring breaker’. Indeed: lords of rings. Who does not want to belong to the inner circle? Now you will understand too why a marriage in the North Sea area is an alliance of consent, sealed with the giving of rings, to this very day.
Note 1 – The first king of Frisia to appear clearly after king Finn, is king Aldgisl in the seventh century. Maybe the father of king Radbod. Read our post The biography of Aldgisl, unplugged. King or local ruler Audulf, in Latin written as Audulfus, is probably a ‘predecessor’ of Aldgisl, and only known from coins found in a.o. the central river area of the Netherlands dated between ca. 575 and 600.
Note 2 – In this post we followed the general conception warrior Hengest invaded Britain as it is written in historic documents. Recently, scholars suggest Britain was not invaded as such after the Romans had pulled out in the year 410. The material culture of the Brits only became disconnected with the Mediterranean one and re-orientated itself towards the North Sea culture. Thus explaining the northern influences. Hengest and its men were therefore not invaders but presumably mercenaries. Hiring mercenaries from the Germanic continent had been the practice for centuries under the Romans and probably continued (Oosthuizen 2019). Read also our post Frisian mercenaries in the Roman Army.
Note 3 – Check out also this YouTube animation about the Finnsburh Fragment of History With Hilbert.
Note 4 – In the epic Beowulf prince Hnaef and the son of king Finn are cremated on a pyre. This was probably an exceptional practice at the flat, treeless salt marshes of Frisia. If you want to learn more about burial practices of the sea people in the terp region during this era, read our post How to bury your mother-in-law.
- Alexander, M., Beowulf. A verse Translation (2001)
- Bazelmans, J., By Weapons Made Worthy. Lords, Retainers and their relationship in Beowulf (1999)
- Bazelmans, J., Zijn de Friezen wel Friezen? (1998)
- Besteman, J.C., Bos, J.M. & Heidinga, H.A., Graven naar Friese koningen. De opgravingen in Wijnaldum (1992)
- Brooks, S. & Harrington S., The Kingdom and People of Kent AD 400-1066. Their History and Archaeology (2010)
- Derks, T. & Roymans, N. (ed), Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity: The Role of Power and Tradition; Bazelmans, J., The early-medieval use of the ethnic names from classical antiquity. The case of the Frisians (2009)
- Dhaeze, W., The Roman North Sea and Channel Coastal Defence. Germanic Seaborne Raids and the Roman Response (2019)
- Dickerson, M.T., The Finnsburg Encounter (1991)
- Dijkstra, M.F.P., Rondom de mondingen van de Rijn en Maas. Landschap en bewoning tussen de 3de en de 9de eeuw in Zuid-Holland, in het bijzonder de Oude Rijnstreek (2011)
- Goede, de A., Redbad. Koning van Friesland (2018)
- Green, D.H. & Siegmund, F (ed), The Continental Saxons from the Migration Period to the tenth century. An ethnographic Perspective (2003)
- Heeringen, van R.M. & Velde, van der H.M. (eds), Struinen door de duinen. Synthetiserend onderzoek naar de bewoningsgeschiedenis van het Hollands duingebied op basis van gegevens verzameld in het Malta-tijdperk (2017)
- Heerma van Voss, L., Michael Pye’s Edge of the World. Een succesvolle, maar mislukte geschiedenis van de Noordzee (2016)
- Higham, N.J. & Ryan, M.j., The Anglo-Saxon World (2013)
- Hines, J., The Role of the Frisians during the Settlement of the British Isles (2001)
- IJssennagger, N.L., Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age (2017)
- Koning, de J., Trans Flehum. Wijnaldum, Den Burg, Texel, Westergo: het Vlie als verbinder en grens (2018)
- Leyser, H., A short history of the Anglo-Saxons (2017)
- Matto, M. & Delanty, G. The Word Exchange – translation of the Exeter Book (2011)
- McClure, E., British place-names in their historical setting (1910)
- Nicolay, J., Nieuwe bewoners van het terpengebied en hun rol bij de opkomst van Fries koningschap. De betekenis van gouden bracteaten en bracteaatachtige hangers uit Friesland (vijfde-zevende eeuw na Chr.) (2005)
- Nicolay, J. & Boer, de J., Roem voor de eeuwigheid. Een vroegmiddeleeuwse zwaardknop uit Friesland (2019)
- Nicolay, J., Oortmerssen, van G., Os, van B. & Nobles, G., Een Vendelhelm uit Hallum? Verslag van een archeologische zoektocht (2010)
- Nicolay, J. & Pelsmaeker, S., De Vendelhelm uit Hallum: een experimentele reconstructie (2018)
- Nicolay, J., Pelsmaeker, S., Postma, D. & Veenstra, H., Hallum: ‘nieuwe Friezen’ in beeld (2018)
- Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Lex Frisionum. Inleiding (2010)
- Nieuwhof, A., De lege vierde eeuw. Jaarverslagen van de Vereniging voor terpenonderzoek (2016)
- Nijdam, H., A Comparison of the Injury Tariffs in the Early Kentish and the Frisian Law Codes (2014)
- Oosthuizen, S., The Emergence of the English (2019)
- Pestell, T., The Kingdom of East Anglia, Frisia and Continental Connections, c. AD 600-900 (2014)
- Paine, L., The sea and civilization. A maritime history of the world (2013)
- Pye, M., The Edge of the World. How the North Sea made us who we are (2014)
- Renswoude, van O., Etymologie Finn (2017)
- Schiffels, S. et al, Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon genomes from East England reveal British migration history (2016)
- Schousboe, K. (ed.), Odin with Horns, Birds or Dragons? Medieval Histories (2016)
- Schuyf, J., Heidense heiligdommen. Zichtbare sporen van een verloren verleden (2019)
- Tol, A.J., De Horn, locatie grafveld-noord, Gemeente Rijnsburg. Archeologisch vooronderzoek: een inventariserend veldonderzoek (proefsleuven) (2006)
- Tolkien, J.R.R., The Silmarillion (1977)
- Tolkien, J.R.R. & Bliss, A. (ed), Finn and Hengest. The Fragment and the Episode (1982)
- Tuuk, van der L., Radbod. Koning in twee werelden (2018)
- Versloot, A.P., The Runic Frisian vowel system. The earliest history of Frisian and Proto-Insular North Frisian (2014)
- Weale, M.E. & Weiss, D.A., Jager, R.F., Bradman, N. & Thomas, M.G., Y Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration (2002)
- Willemsen, A., Gouden Middeleeuwen. Nederland in de Merovingische wereld, 400-700 na Chr. (2014)
The Finnsburh Fragment
(…) hornas byrnað? Hnæf hléoþrode ðá heaþogeong cyning: né ðis ne dagað éastan né hér draca ne fléogeð né hér ðisse healle hornas ne byrnað. Ac hér forþ berað, fugelas singað, gylleð gráeghama, gúðwudu hlynneð, scyld scefte oncwyð. Nú scýneð þes móna waðol under wolcnum; nú árísað wéadáeda ðé ðisne folces níð fremman willað. Ac onwacnigeað nú, wígend míne, habbað éowre linda, hicgeaþ on ellen, winnað on orde, wesað on móde. Ðá árás mænig goldhladen ðegn, gyrde hine his swurde; ðá tó dura éodon drihtlice cempan Sigeferð and Éaha, hyra sword getugon and æt óþrum durum Ordláf and Gúþláf and Hengest sylf hwearf him on láste. Ðá gýt Gárulf Gúðere stýrde, ðæt hé swá fréolíc feorh forman síþe tó ðáere healle durum hyrsta ne báere nú hyt níþa heard ányman wolde ac hé frægn ofer eal undearninga déormód hæleþ hwá ðá duru héolde. Sigeferþ is mín nama, cweþ hé. Ic eom Secgena léod, wreccea wíde cúð, fæla ic wéana gebád heordra hilda. Ðé is gýt hér witod swæþer ðú sylf tó mé sécean wylle. Ðá wæs on healle wælslihta gehlyn, sceolde cellod bord cénum on handa, bánhelm berstan -buruhðelu dynede- oð æt ðáere gúðe Gárulf gecrangealra áerest eorðbúendra Gúðláfes sunu, ymbe hyne gódra fæla hwearflícra hráew. Hræfen wandrode sweart and sealobrún. Swurdléoma stód swylce eal Finnisburh fýrenu wáere. Ne gefrægn ic náefre wurþlícor æt wera hilde sixtig sigebeorna sél gebáeran né néfre swétne medo sél forgyldan ðonne Hnæfe guldan his hægstealdas. Hig fuhton fíf dagas, swá hyra nán ne féol drihtgesíða, ac hig ðá duru héoldon. Ðá gewát him wund hæleð on wæg gangan, sáede þæt his byrne ábrocen wáere heresceorp unhrór and éac wæs his helm ðýrel. Ðá hine sóna frægn folces hyrde, hú ðá wígend hyra wunda genáeson oððe hwæþer ðáera hyssa (…)
(…) gables burning? Then proclaimed Hnaef, the battle-young king: This is not the eastern dawn nor is a dragon flying here nor here does this hall’s gables burn. But here they bear forth, birds screech, the grey-coated wolf bays, the war-wood clashes, the shield answers the shaft. Now the moon shines, wandering under the clouds; now woe-deeds come to pass which this people’s hatred desires to fulfill. But awake now, my warriors, grasp your linden-wood shields, resolve upon courage, trive to the vanguard, be high-spirited. Then arose many a gold-laden thane, girded his sword then moved to the door the noble champions Sigeferth and Eaha, drew their swords, and at the other door, Ordlaf and Guthlaf and Hengest himself came just behind them. Then yet Garulf directed Guthere that he so excellent a life at the first journey to the doors of the hall, armored, should not venture since now one hard in hatred wished to take it away; but he asked over all, openly, the daring-hearted hero, who held the door. Sigeferth is my name, said he. I am a man of the Sedgean, an adventurer widely known, I have endured many misfortunes, fierce battles. Even now appointed here for you which thing for yourself from me you will attain. Then was in the hall the tumult of carnage, the round shield-board must in the hands of the bold, the bone-helm burst -the planks of the fortress resounded- until in the battle Garulf fell the first of all of the dwellers in the land, Guthlaf’s son, around him many good mortals’ carcasses. The raven hovered sweart and shimmering-dark. Sword-light stood as if all of Finnesburh were in flames. I have never heard that more worthily in battle of men of sixty victory-warriors bearing themselves better nor ever for sweet mead making better requital than to Hnaef gave his retainers. They fought for five days, as none of them fell, the troop-companions, but they held the doors. Then the hero went wounded, passing away, he said that his byrnie was broken apart, his war-garb weak and also his helmet was pierced. Then immediately asked him the protector of the people how well the warriors their wounds survived or which of the young men (…)
The Beowulf episode
(…) þær wæs sang ond sweg samod ætgædere fore Healfdenes hildewisan, gomenwudu greted, gid oft wrecen, ðonne healgamen Hroþgares scop æfter medobence mænan scolde be Finnes eaferum, ða hie se fær begeat, hæleð Healfdena, Hnæf Scyldinga, in Freswæle feallan scolde. Ne huru Hildeburh herian þorfte Eotena treowe; unsynnum wearð beloren leofum æt þam lindplegan, bearnum ond broðrum; hie on gebyrd hruron, gare wunde. þæt wæs geomuru ides! Nalles holinga Hoces dohtor meotodsceaft bemearn, syþðan morgen com, ða heo under swegle geseon meahte morþorbealo maga, þær heo ær mæste heold worolde wynne. Wig ealle fornam Finnes þegnas nemne feaum anum, þæt he ne mehte on þæm meðelstede wig Hengeste wiht gefeohtan, ne þa wealafe wige forþringan þeodnes ðegna; ac hig him geþingo budon, þæt hie him oðer flet eal gerymdon, healle ond heahsetl, þæt hie healfre geweald wið Eotena bearn agan moston, ond æt feohgyftum Folcwaldan sunu dogra gehwylce Dene weorþode, Hengestes heap hringum wenede efne swa swiðe sincgestreonum fættan goldes, swa he Fresena cyn on beorsele byldan wolde. ða hie getruwedon on twa healfa fæste frioðuwære. Fin Hengeste elne, unflitme aðum benemde þæt he þa wealafe weotena dome arum heolde, þæt ðær ænig mon wordum ne worcum wære ne bræce, ne þurh inwitsearo æfre gemænden ðeah hie hira beaggyfan banan folgedon ðeodenlease, þa him swa geþearfod wæs; gyf þonne Frysna hwylc frecnan spræce ðæs morþorhetes myndgiend wære, þonne hit sweordes ecg seðan scolde. Ad wæs geæfned ond icge gold ahæfen of horde. Herescyldinga betst beadorinca wæs on bæl gearu. æt þæm ade wæs eþgesyne swatfah syrce, swyn ealgylden, eofer irenheard, æþeling manig wundum awyrded; sume on wæle crungon. Het ða Hildeburh æt Hnæfes ade hire selfre sunu sweoloðe befæstan, banfatu bærnan ond on bæl don eame on eaxle. Ides gnornode, geomrode giddum. Guðrinc astah. Wand to wolcnum wælfyra mæst, hlynode for hlawe; hafelan multon, bengeato burston, ðonne blod ætspranc, laðbite lices. Lig ealle forswealg, gæsta gifrost, þara ðe þær guð fornam bega folces; wæs hira blæd scacen. Gewiton him ða wigend wica neosian, freondum befeallen, Frysland geseon, hamas ond heaburh. Hengest ða gyt wælfagne winter wunode mid Finne eal unhlitme. Eard gemunde, þeah þe he ne meahte on mere drifan hringedstefnan; holm storme weol, won wið winde, winter yþe beleac isgebinde, oþðæt oþer com gear in geardas, swa nu gyt deð, þa ðe syngales sele bewitiað, wuldortorhtan weder. ða wæs winter scacen, fæger foldan bearm. Fundode wrecca, gist of geardum; he to gyrnwræce swiðor þohte þonne to sælade, gif he torngemot þurhteon mihte þæt he Eotena bearn inne gemunde. Swa he ne forwyrnde woroldrædenne, þonne him Hunlafing hildeleoman, billa selest, on bearm dyde, þæs wæron mid Eotenum ecge cuðe. Swylce ferhðfrecan Fin eft begeat sweordbealo sliðen æt his selfes ham, siþðan grimne gripe Guðlaf ond Oslaf æfter sæsiðe, sorge, mændon, ætwiton weana dæl; ne meahte wæfre mod forhabban in hreþre. ða wæs heal roden feonda feorum, swilce Fin slægen, cyning on corþre, ond seo cwen numen. Sceotend Scyldinga to scypon feredon eal ingesteald eorðcyninges, swylce hie æt Finnes ham findan meahton sigla, searogimma. Hie on sælade drihtlice wif to Denum feredon, læddon to leodum. (…)
(…) Then song and music mingled sounds in the presence of Healfdene’s head-of-armies and harping was heard with the hero-lay as Hrothgar’s singer the hall-joy woke along the mead-seats, making his song of that sudden raid on the sons of Finn. Healfdene’s hero, Hnaef the Scylding, was fated to fall in the Frisian slaughter. Hildeburh needed not hold in value her enemies’ honor! Innocent both were the loved ones she lost at the linden-play, bairn and brother, they bowed to fate, stricken by spears; ‘twas a sorrowful woman! None doubted why the daughter of Hoc bewailed her doom when dawning came, and under the sky she saw them lying, kinsmen murdered, where most she had kenned of the sweets of the world! By war were swept, too, Finn’s own liegemen, and few were left; in the parleying-place he could ply no longer weapon, nor war could he wage on Hengest, and rescue his remnant by right of arms from the prince’s thane. A pact he offered: another dwelling the Danes should have, hall and high-seat, and half the power should fall to them in Frisian land; and at the fee-gifts, Folcwald’s son day by day the Danes should honor, the folk of Hengest favor with rings, even as truly, with treasure and jewels, with fretted gold, as his Frisian kin he meant to honor in ale-hall there. Pact of peace they plighted further on both sides firmly. Finn to Hengest with oath, upon honor, openly promised that woeful remnant, with wise-men’s aid, nobly to govern, so none of the guests by word or work should warp the treaty, or with malice of mind bemoan themselves as forced to follow their fee-giver’s slayer, lord-less men, as their lot ordained. Should Frisian, moreover, with foeman’s taunt, that murderous hatred to mind recall, then edge of the sword must seal his doom. Oaths were given, and ancient gold heaped from hoard. The hardy Scylding, battle-thane best, on his bale-fire lay. All on the pyre were plain to see the gory sark, the gilded swine-crest, boar of hard iron, and athelings many slain by the sword: at the slaughter they fell. It was Hildeburh’s hest, at Hnaef’s own pyre the bairn of her body on brands to lay, his bones to burn, on the bale-fire placed, at his uncle’s side. In sorrowful dirges bewept them the woman: great wailing ascended. Then wound up to welkin the wildest of death-fires, roared o’er the hillock: heads all were melted, gashes burst, and blood gushed out from bites of the body. Bale-fire devoured, greediest spirit, those spared not by war out of either folk: their flower was gone. Then hastened those heroes their home to see, friendless, to find the Frisian land, houses and high burg. Hengest still through the death-dyed winter dwelt with Finn, holding pact, yet of home he minded, though powerless his ring-decked prow to drive over the waters, now waves rolled fierce lashed by the winds, or winter locked them in icy fetters. Then fared another year to men’s dwellings, as yet they do, the sun bright skies, that their season ever duly await. Far off winter was driven; fair lay earth’s breast; and fain was the rover, the guest, to depart, though more gladly he pondered on wreaking his vengeance than roaming the deep, and how to hasten the hot encounter where sons of the Frisians were sure to be. So he escaped not the common doom, when Hun with “Lafing,” the light-of-battle, best of blades, his bosom pierced: its edge was famed with the Frisian earls. On fierce-heart Finn there fell likewise, on himself at home, the horrid sword-death; for Guthlaf and Oslaf of grim attack had sorrowing told, from sea-ways landed, mourning their woes. Finn’s wavering spirit bode not in breast. The burg was reddened with blood of foemen, and Finn was slain, king amid clansmen and the queen was taken. To their ship the Scylding warriors bore all the chattels the chieftain owned, whatever they found in Finn’s domain of gems and jewels. The gentle wife o’er paths of the deep to the Danes they bore, led to her land. (…)